Conflicting peer valuation rankings across methods
Is a seemingly cheap peer cheap only on earnings multiples, and expensive on cash flow or enterprise value?
CSVをダウンロード
サンプルJSON
仕様JSON
サンプル基準日
0700.HK Tencent Holdings | Hang Seng Index | 2025-10-16 – 2026-10-16 | HKD
- Highest item: P/S
- 59.2 0–100
- Lowest item: P/E
- 53.1 0–100
- Average
- 55.7 0–100
- Number of items
- 4 items
Valuation ranking conflict matrix
Peer valuation percentile (0–100) (マトリクス)
Companies with the widest method gaps
Largest percentile gap across methods (percentage points) (棒)
Denominator basis and valid sample
Peer valuation percentile (0–100) and Largest percentile gap across methods (percentage points) (表)
サンプルデータ行
| Valuation method | Peer valuation percentile (0–100) | Largest percentile gap across methods (percentage points) | Data date (sample) |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 53.1 | 40.2 | 2026-10-16 |
| P/S | 59.2 | 71.7 | 2026-10-16 |
| P/FCF | 54.3 | 58.1 | 2026-10-16 |
| EV/EBITDA | 56.2 | 77.6 | 2026-10-16 |