Conflicting peer valuation rankings across methods
Is a seemingly cheap peer cheap only on earnings multiples, and expensive on cash flow or enterprise value?
Download CSV
Sample JSON
Specification JSON
Sample as of
0700.HK Tencent Holdings | Hang Seng Index | 2025-10-16 – 2026-10-16 | HKD
- Highest item: P/S
- 59.2 0–100
- Lowest item: P/E
- 53.1 0–100
- Average
- 55.7 0–100
- Number of items
- 4 items
Valuation ranking conflict matrix
Peer valuation percentile (0–100) (Matrix)
Companies with the widest method gaps
Largest percentile gap across methods (percentage points) (Bar)
Denominator basis and valid sample
Peer valuation percentile (0–100) and Largest percentile gap across methods (percentage points) (Table)
Sample data rows
| Valuation method | Peer valuation percentile (0–100) | Largest percentile gap across methods (percentage points) | Data date (sample) |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 53.1 | 40.2 | 2026-10-16 |
| P/S | 59.2 | 71.7 | 2026-10-16 |
| P/FCF | 54.3 | 58.1 | 2026-10-16 |
| EV/EBITDA | 56.2 | 77.6 | 2026-10-16 |