Conflicting peer valuation rankings across methods
Is a seemingly cheap peer cheap only on earnings multiples, and expensive on cash flow or enterprise value?
CSV 다운로드
샘플 JSON
사양 JSON
샘플 기준일
0700.HK Tencent Holdings | Hang Seng Index | 2025-10-16 – 2026-10-16 | HKD
- Highest item: P/S
- 59.2 0–100
- Lowest item: P/E
- 53.1 0–100
- Average
- 55.7 0–100
- Number of items
- 4 items
Valuation ranking conflict matrix
Peer valuation percentile (0–100) (매트릭스)
Companies with the widest method gaps
Largest percentile gap across methods (percentage points) (막대)
Denominator basis and valid sample
Peer valuation percentile (0–100) and Largest percentile gap across methods (percentage points) (표)
샘플 데이터 행
| Valuation method | Peer valuation percentile (0–100) | Largest percentile gap across methods (percentage points) | Data date (sample) |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 53.1 | 40.2 | 2026-10-16 |
| P/S | 59.2 | 71.7 | 2026-10-16 |
| P/FCF | 54.3 | 58.1 | 2026-10-16 |
| EV/EBITDA | 56.2 | 77.6 | 2026-10-16 |